There's a well-known Rembrandt sketch I like to ponder around Good Friday. Known as
"Three Crosses," it portrays a crowded and chaotic crucifixion scene... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rembrandt_Harmensz._van_Rijn_-_Christ_Crucified_Between_the_Two_Thieves_(%22The_Three_Crosses%22)_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
Blending into the crowd under the crosses on the hill is a clearly Renaissance-era man, purported to be either the artist himself or the patron of the painting (often done in religious art of that era). The figure seems to be gazing elsewhere, perhaps oblivious to the significance of the drama playing out right in front of him. As we approach Good Friday, it's always worth reflecting: If I were there, literally under the cross, where would I be, and what would I be doing?
Blending into the crowd under the crosses on the hill is a clearly Renaissance-era man, purported to be either the artist himself or the patron of the painting (often done in religious art of that era). The figure seems to be gazing elsewhere, perhaps oblivious to the significance of the drama playing out right in front of him. As we approach Good Friday, it's always worth reflecting: If I were there, literally under the cross, where would I be, and what would I be doing?
As followers of Jesus, of course,
we are all called to "live under the cross." I've been thinking
about that ever since an encounter we had in El Salvador. We were meeting with
a group of pastors and other local church leaders and some of their spouses.
The topic was World Vision's work through a wonderful initiative called Channels
of Hope, to help the church credibly live out the Gospel they
proclaim.
Channels of Hope (CoH) was created
during the worst years of the AIDS pandemic, and during that time churches were
often the most stigmatizing institution in town. It's hard to remember
back even 10-15 years ago, at how condemnatory and vitriolic our own churches
and churches in Africa could be regarding AIDS. Many saw their role as
pointing out "sin" from some high and holy perch, and they hadn't
begun to think about where Jesus would be in this situation, or how the church
could lead the way in compassionate response to those who were sick and dying.
At one time, I'm ashamed to say, I could be painted right there in that
crowd.
Channels of Hope walked faith
leaders through these realizations, which convicted their own hearts, and then
empowered them to reach out tangibly with hope and help in their communities in
beyond. Over 200,000(!) pastors and faith leaders have gone through this
program, and they in turn have walked millions of congregants through this same
amazing transformation, from sideline finger-waggers to frontline helping
hands… one reason the AIDS crisis is abating.
Now this same methodology is being
applied to new issues, particularly around child protection and "gender"
issues (demeaning and mistreating girls and women), and we were hearing about
these that day in El Salvador. This new training helps participants
explore their own upbringing and cultural overlays... what we "bring with
us” to the Bible when we try to understand and teach it.
We can't help it that we start
with a specific family and cultural context; everyone does. But we can
acknowledge that we have one, and try continually to be open to our fellow
Christ-followers who can take us by the hand around our resulting blind spots.
And that was exactly the epiphany we learned of this day.
After we'd heard a bit from the
pastors, the question was asked about what the impact has been. Eventually
Pastor Juan announced with a quiet urgency that he wanted to say something.
First, he asked one of our visitors who was sitting next to him if she
could move so that Juan's wife--his "First Lady"--could sit by him.
His need to speak up and this symbolic action spoke even more
directly than their subsequent words about their private transformation.
He invited his esposa to
be the first to speak: "We’ve been trained on gender equality,” she
began. “This has helped us a lot, even as a couple: My husband and I have been
working to make adjustments in our own relationship. We understand each other
better. We spend more time together and more with our children. We are doing
what we can with the families in church, but we have improved
as well."
Then Juan added, "We learned
about disorganized creation and reorganized creation… This has to do with us as
a couple. God created a natural order. Then sin came and created
disorder. But with Christ, everything is reordered." He went on to say
that in the church they dedicate one Sunday of every month to family issues and
have instituted an annual retreat to talk about family concerns using the
training they've received. Clearly, they have made this learning a major focus
in their church.
Just as clearly, there was more to
their personal story than they spelled out, but in a machismo culture,
the details are not difficult to imagine. But beautifully, now his wife truly
seemed to be his “First Lady.”
After others had spoken, I felt a
strong urge to comment on one aspect of what Pastor Juan had said. But how does
one coming like me from a culture of power speak properly to a humble servant
of God? I dropped onto my knees from my chair. I thanked him for his
comments, but then tried to gingerly point out that it was not the very same
moment he became a Christian when suddenly his family life was “reordered.”
Rather, the act of opening ourselves to God in Christ is an invitation
to remain continually open to God’s conviction and to “say yes” in
obedience whenever we hear his voice. “You humbly opened yourself to new
teaching and other ways of thinking, and when you heard God’s voice in that,
you were obedient to it."
This feels very important to me.
Living "under the cross" must call us to continual transformation,
not a one-time event and then a lifetime of intransigence. I don't think
that there has been a time when I have changed as much in my Christian life as
I have the past 5-10 years. I’m no longer afraid of discovering new areas where
I've been wrong. Nowadays I simply assume that in many areas I was “born
blind,” and I can't wait to recruit the help of others—provocative authors,
diverse cultures, historical figures—to help me navigate past my
blind spots in order to get a better understanding of Jesus than any single
culture or upbringing could give me, my own included.
Don't misunderstand me: I don't
enjoy feeling convicted or discovering areas where I've been a judge rather
than a light, where my viewpoint has been only a view from one point without
considering the views of others. This is not a good feeling.
But I now have a different goal
which drives me, rather than defending my viewpoint: to be continually
transformed more and more into the image of Christ, as quickly as I can. And
this means letting go of my preconceptions and admitting quickly when I just
might not be as dead-right as I thought I was. If it's true that only together
we form Christ’s Body, then I desperately need all those other parts of the
body to help me navigate, if we are to make any progress at all in the work we
are together called to do.
Pastor Juan sat there without
pride, having let go and been transformed on this issue. Not afraid to be
convicted. Not afraid to say that his eyes had been opened, that he was wrong,
that all the Scripture verses he had used to justify his previous actions and
attitudes toward his children and wife were trumped by others which until
recently he had simply ignored as being irrelevant.
Today, as a result, he is leading
the way for his entire congregation on that same journey past this cultural
blind spot, and leading his fellow pastors in what it means to "confess
our sins to one another,” bearing each other’s burdens “and so fulfill the law
of Christ." What would it really mean to take seriously our need to
confront and confess our own flaws and blind spots as the only way we can
actually "fulfill the law of Christ" together?
It might mean staying in that
place of continual transformation, of living under the cross.
Cory
March 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment